Angels and Pins or The Day After Synod

One needs to know quite a lot of philosophy to understand St Bonaventure, yet I wouldn’t myself quote him in support of any philosophical argument. In fact, I would go further and say he is among the least ‘accessible’ of the philosopher-theologians who have graced the Catholic Church. He was, first and foremost, a theologian — something he saw as eminently practical — one who believed that faith and reason are reconcilable and that many routes lead to God:

A master of the memorable phrase, Bonaventure held that philosophy opens the mind to at least three different routes humans can take on their journey to God. Non-intellectual material creatures he conceived as shadows and vestiges (literally, footprints) of God, understood as the ultimate cause of a world philosophical reason can prove was created at a first moment in time. Intellectual creatures he conceived of as images and likenesses of God, the workings of the human mind and will leading us to God understood as illuminator of knowledge and donor of grace and virtue. The final route to God is the route of being, in which Bonaventure brought Anselm’s argument together with Aristotelian and Neoplatonic metaphysics to view God as the absolutely perfect being whose essence entails its existence, an absolutely simple being that causes all other, composite beings to exist.

So, why am I thinking about St Bonaventure on the day after the Church of England Synod voted in favour of women becoming bishops? Quite apart from the fact that today happens to be his feast day, I think it is an encouragement to those of us who see in the official response of the Catholic Church in England and Wales a certain sadness, a realisation that we are further apart on the road to visible ecclesial unity than we had hoped. We must continue to work and pray together, to build on the deeper understanding, friendship and mutual love we already have, yet at the same time not shy away from our theological differences. In the joy and delight felt by many of our Church of England friends, those theological differences may seem less substantial than they do to those of us who are Catholic or Orthodox.

People sometimes dismiss the old question, ‘How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?’ as an absurdity, not seeing that, although we wouldn’t express it in quite the same way, it is, in fact, a perfectly legitimate question about the nature of corporeal and incorporeal existence. Theology and questions of ecclesiology are fundamental to the search for visible unity. Agreement on the nature of the episcopate is, from the Catholic (and I would think, Orthodox) perspective, essential. Yesterday presented us with another very great theological challenge.


4 thoughts on “Angels and Pins or The Day After Synod”

  1. I am one who is filled with Joy that the Synod vote was a yes. For far too long, the Ministry of Women in the Church of England has been subject to discrimination and prejudice, which those doing the oppressing use Biblical texts and traditional precedents to justify a purely human fallibility.

    I know that this will cause pain to those Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches that retain a view that conflicts with that of the position of the CofE, and with many within the Anglican Communion, where this decision is described in impeding communion between individual provinces and Lambeth.

    I have heard and seen the pain felt by many women in ministry in the CofE for many years before the flawed decision made in 1993 to permit the Ordination of Women and the different suffering experienced, when once ordained, their ministry was treated as at best 2nd Class and at worst, totally invalid. Otherwise kindly Priests and Laity has snubbed, insulted and ignored Ordained Ministry and many left the CofE for Rome or elsewhere, because they felt unable to accept such ministry.

    I believe that despite the difficulties that this decision presents to Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches, it was the right one for the CofE, because our mission and ministry has long been compromised by the inequalities inherent in restricting ministry roles to males only.

    It’s a risk, but surely much of life and Christ’s mission to us is about risk taking, we can only hope and pray that led by the Holy Spirit it will bear fruit in permitting the Good News of Jesus Christ to be proclaimed without the mote in our eye.

  2. Thank you for this, Sr Catherine: a compassionate example of what I, as a Catholic, might legitimately and charitably respond to what’s been happening in the Church of England. I left the C of E 14 years ago because of the continuing pain and disunity following its decision to ordain women to the priesthood (I was a permanent deacon in the C of E).

    Since then I’ve often said that I don’t feel I have any right now to comment about events in the C of E (still less to return to the debates and arguments which sapped so much energy from my ministry in the old days), and I do believe that to be true, but you’ve reminded me that I may still express my sadness – and of course to go on praying for my Anglican friends as we all long for unity.

Comments are closed.